BEWARE OF FAKE INSTITUTES WITH SIMILAR NAMES. blank    blank
banner

Bharatiya Sakshya Bill 2023: Evidence Act Transformation



  Dec 22, 2023

Indian Evidence Act (IEA) Replaced by Bharatiya Sakshya Bill (BSB) 2023



Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA)

Purpose: Governs how evidence is presented in Indian courts.

Scope: Applies to all civil and criminal cases.

Key Amendments:

2000: Included electronic records as secondary evidence.

2013: Focused on consent in rape cases, placing the burden of proof on the accused and disregarding the victim's past sexual history for consent determination.

Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023 (BSB)

Goal: Proposed to replace the IEA.

Intention: To modernize and simplify evidence laws.

The Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023

Highlights of the Bill

Replacement of Indian Evidence Act: The Bharatiya Sakshya Bill (BSB) updates the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (IEA), preserving most provisions about confessions, fact relevancy, and burden of proof.

Evidence Types: Continues the IEA's distinction between documentary (including original documents and proofs of original content) and oral evidence.

Electronic Records as Primary Evidence: BSB redefines electronic records, such as data in semiconductor memory or communication devices, as primary evidence.

Expansion of Secondary Evidence: Enlarges the scope to include oral and written admissions, and testimonies from experts in document examination.

Key Issues and Analysis

Tampering of Electronic Records: The Supreme Court highlighted the risk of tampering with electronic records. BSB allows their admissibility but lacks measures to prevent tampering or contamination during investigations. Contradiction in Admissibility: BSB retains the need for electronic records' certification for admissibility, yet also classifies them as documents, which may not require certification, creating a potential contradiction.

Information from Police Custody: Maintains the admissibility of facts discovered from an accused in custody. Concerns remain about coercion and the absence of adequate safeguards.

Distinction in Custody Information: Despite suggestions from the Law Commission to remove the distinction in information obtained from an accused in or out of police custody, BSB does not incorporate this change.

Injuries in Police Custody: The Law Commission's recommendation to presume police liability for injuries to an accused in custody is not included in BSB.


Share:
 

Get a call back

Fill the below form to get free counselling for UPSC Civil Services exam preparation

 
UPSC DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS

 
DECLINING HEALTH SPENDING IN INDIA
 
PYTHIAN GAMES IN INDIA: A CULTURAL RENAISSANCE
 
India's Small Modular Reactor (SMR) Push: A Public-Private Partnership
 
KODO MILLETS:ELEPHANT DEATHS IN BANDHAVGARH DUE TO FUNGAL POISONING
 
LIGHTNING RODS PREVENT LIGHTNING STRIKES:THE MECHANICS
 
RANSOMEWARE ETC:CYBERSECURITY THREATS IN INDIA
 
PANDIT RAM NARAYAN AND THE EVOLUTION OF SARANGI IN INDIAN CLASSICAL MUSIC
 
WESTERN GHATS KING COBRA NAMED “KALINGA”
 
SARNA RELIGIOUS CODE: IDENTITY AND DEMANDS OF TRIBAL COMMUNITIES
 
PROJECT SHAURYA GATHA
 
ELON MUSK CANNOT BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
 
NATIONAL QUANTUM MISSION:INDIA
 
DONALD TRUMP’S MERCANTILIST POLICIES: IMPACT ON INDIA
 
EMPEROR PENGUINS AND CLIMATE CHANGE: FAQs
 
PANDAVA GUHALU/GUTTALU: ANCIENT TELANGANA